Since the launch of various large language model tools with advanced artificial intelligence capabilities such as text generation, the academic landscape has experienced a permanent shift. This is because these tools have presented powerful writing and content creation capabilities that have dramatically reduced the time needed to produce text. However, the same laudable capabilities have created another problem educators cannot simply ignore: the problem of students using AI to complete assignments.
Nonetheless, instructors have responded by turning to diverse strategies, including software such as Turnitin to detect AI-written content. Even though systems helping to detect AI are increasingly gaining attention, this should not imply that the application of AI is prohibited in education. Contrastingly, AI can become a strategic partner that supports learning rather than a tool for enabling academic dishonesty. That said, this article breaks down how educators can identify assignments completed using AI, severe implications of deceptive practices in academia, and how learners can use AI responsibly instead of as a substitute for individual efforts.
🕵️♂️ Detection Methods Faculty Use
📝 Writing Style Indicators
A common feature of AI-written content that professors look for to identify work authored by a machine is the unnatural and overly formal tone which is characteristic of this type of work. Interestingly, AI-generated content might look genuine at first, but a reader will ultimately discern its illegitimacy. For instance, AI content will feature all or some of the following characteristics: a fixed pattern of writing utilized throughout the text, the repetitive use of a set of phrases, and the lack of personal phrasing characteristic of each person’s style of writing. Furthermore, AI has a tendency to develop sentences with overly complicated word choices or pairings, for example, “The pedagogical implications of these technologically mediated knowledge-acquisition modalities necessitate a comprehensive reevaluation of extant assessment paradigms,” which exposes its use.
Instructors also notice that work is AI-generated when it lacks terminologies that could have been integrated by a student or even the lack of conceptual depth. With AI being in its nascent stage, it might lack capability to act on detailed instructions such as drawing on multiple course-specific materials, especially voluminous works. This drawback means AI would unsuccessfully use class materials to generate content, which may expose the use of external help to complete assignments. Thus, the lack of engagement with course materials is a flaw common with AI tools that will certainly expose work generated by a tool.
🚨 Content Warning Signs
The lack of content originality and critical analysis of ideas and materials can also indicate the use of AI to generate assignments. A major sign that pinpoints this fact is the absence of references to readings required for the completion of an assignment and the lack of engagement with previous class discussions. Usually, instructors design assessments to measure understanding of certain concepts which should be demonstrated with reference to provided materials such as lectures, course texts, and class discussions. Thus, generic responses lacking customization to the specific requirements of the professor raise suspicion, which can indicate the use of AI. Furthermore, engagements with AI tools have also revealed a common flaw among them which is generating generalized examples instead of giving more focused and subject-specific examples.
Quality discrepancy affecting various sections of a student’s work is also a warning sign for the possible use of AI to aid in assignment completion. Using AI to draft sections of a task in addition to individual effort can result in noticeable discrepancies in the quality of the work that could aid in identifying possible use of AI to generate work. As a machine, AI can adhere to writing standards; however, mixing it with sections completed using individual effort can expose dramatic shifts in the quality of various sections of the work. A keen evaluator will easily identify such inconsistencies.
💻 Digital Verification Approaches
Increasing cases of AI-aided dishonesty among students consequently stimulated the development of AI detection software that has increasingly gained widespread usage in academia to help in detecting AI-authored work. Popularly used AI detection tools include, among others, Turnitin AI detection software, GPTZero, and Originality.ai. The tools employ a mix of strategies to predict the use of AI that may involve checking patterns of word use, unnatural word sequences, and level of perfection in writing to detect text originality. The tools are yet to become flawless, but even then they provide professors with additional support to verify content originality.
Other signs that work may be AI-authored are the background data of an assignment such as an assignment completed and submitted within an unusual time frame. Additionally, an irregular formatting style that is not used in academic writing and a dramatic change in a student’s pattern of writing are some digital pointers that evaluators can use to verify AI use.
⚠️ Academic and Professional Risks of Using AI in Assignments
The use of AI to complete assignments is classified as academic misconduct in many institutions of higher learning that attracts a range of severe penalties. It could lead to expulsion, receiving a failing grade on an assignment or entire failure in a course, and suspension among other punishments. Many institutions have a strict zero-tolerance policy to academic dishonesty because of its severe negative implications on the credibility of education it offers.
Additionally, dependence on AI can limit intellectual development in fields of specialty. Using AI to substitute individual effort helps in completing tasks effortlessly at the cost of missing out on the development of critical thinking skills and problem-solving competencies. Notably, these competencies are essential for success in later professional practice; thus, using AI to circumvent critical competencies sets the stage for possible failure or trouble.
Using AI to complete assignments can also have far-reaching implications in later professional life by affecting individual career advancement opportunities due to lacking required thinking competencies for more complex responsibilities. Suffering detection can also damage a person’s academic reputation and subsequently cause a domino effect with challenges obtaining institutional recommendation, internship, or employment among other consequences. Furthermore, this form of academic dishonesty can completely erode trust and limit career progression in fields where trust and credibility are critical.
✅ Proper AI Integration Strategies
🤝 Honest Disclosure Practices
Students can liberally use AI only with permission from their evaluators but with adherence to the course guidelines concerning disclosure. To this end, students need to follow appropriate citation guidelines for AI-generated content. Some disclosure methods include accompanying AI-generated content with corresponding footnotes revealing the AI generator tool used to create the particular content. Honesty concerning the use of AI in academia is critical in demonstrating responsible use of emerging technologies.
🛠️ Appropriate AI Use
In academia, the use of AI is best applied with restrictions in use, for instance, to supplement rather than replace individual effort. Supplementary uses of AI in academic writing include using it to brainstorm ideas, improve a thesis statement, or seek suggestions to modify structural flaws. Other practical and appropriate uses of the tool are in generating an outline, especially to gain insights about the course of a paper. Generating subtopics for novice researchers and writers can prove challenging; thus, AI tools can be handy in such cases.
The rest of the work, for instance, the arguments, analysis, and discussions need to be the individual student’s work. Doing the work completely through individual effort is essential in ensuring a student develops critical thinking and analysis skills among other competencies. Furthermore, an instructor can easily spot the use of AI in writing the work; thus, students should be careful about this decision.
🧠 Learning Enhancement Tactics
When substantially using AI, editing and tailoring the work according to assignment expectations is crucial to ensure compliance. Thus, students should considerably edit AI-generated work to ensure correctness of the material, to include material from the course, and to polish arguments to their liking. Supposing a student uses AI to write a summary, it would be pragmatic to edit the work by verifying content alignment with coursework, adding citations, and modifying the word or sentence patterns. Engagement with AI in this way is crucial because this allows active learning compared to submitting the work without modification.
🎯 Conclusion
Most importantly, AI is significantly reshaping learning although it poses serious risks to the quality of education offered to learners. As the rush to control its use heightens, there is a need to cautiously approach the matter. This is because AI carries a host of benefits despite the threats it poses to the quality of education through its misuse.
Why risk getting flagged for AI when you can get custom, course-specific help from a real expert? At Ace My Course, we don’t just write – we understand your assignment. Let us help you impress your professor the right way.
Corey Meek, Academic Writer at aceMYcourseWORK
